Allowed

S.Kamalakannan v. The District Manager

Madras HC10 Apr 2015WP/6022/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court of Madras directed the respondent to conclude disciplinary proceedings within three months and pay pending subsistence allowance with future monthly installments until a final order is passed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conclude disciplinary proceedings within three months; payment of subsistence allowance and arrears within four weeks, thereafter payable on or before 10th of every month.

S.Kamalakannan Vs The District Manager — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.04.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

W.P.NO.6022 OF 2015

¶6

AND M.P.NOS.1 AND 2 OF 2015

¶7

S.Kamalakannan ... Petitioner

¶8

Versus
The District Manager
TASMAC Limited
B-4, Ambattur Industrial Area,
Chennai – 58. ... Respondent

¶9

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondent from terminating the service of the petitioner as Salesman till the findings of the enquiry officer is duly served and adequate opportunity is given to the petitioner.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran For Respondent : Mr.S.Muthuraj Standing Counsel for TASMAC O R D E R

¶11

Heard both sides. By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶12

2.The petitioner is a Salesman in TASMAC. A disciplinary action has been initiated against him and he was placed under suspension.

¶13

3.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to forbear the respondent from terminating him from service. The miscellaneous petition is filed seeking for direction to pay him subsistence allowance.

¶14

4.The learned counsel for the respondent TASMAC states that the enquiry would be concluded and final order would be passed in three months. It is also stated that if the subsistence allowance is not paid, the same would be paid to him.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

5.Recoding the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent TASMAC, the respondent is directed to conclude the disciplinary proceedings and pass final orders, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If subsistence allowance is not paid to the petitioner so far, the respondent is also directed to pay the subsistence allowance and arrears shall be paid within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, the subsistence allowance shall be paid on or before 10^th of every succeeding month, till final order is passed.

¶17

6.The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
VRC/TK
To
The District Manager
TASMAC Limited
B-4, Ambattur Industrial Area,
Chennai – 58.
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.N.Ravichandran, Advocate Sr.20036
+ 1 c to Mr.S. Muthuraj, Advocate Sr.20316
W.P.NO.6022 OF 2015
TM(CO)
Eu 13.05.15

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Kamalakannan v. The District Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Kamalakannan v. The District Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

murugababu Vs The Inspector General of

G.Ramachandran Vs The Secretary to Government

P.Sekar, Vs The Commissioner of Municipal

R.Mohan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

R.Sivabalan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

A.Valarmathi Vs The Government of Tamilnadu