Dismissed

G.Ramachandran v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC9 Apr 2015WP/10068/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought cancellation of another candidate's name from the certificate verification list of a Senior Lecturer post and his declaration as the next eligible candidate due to alleged bogus certificates. The court held that since verification was pending and the other candidate was not a party, it could not intervene at this stage.

What the court decided

AI extract

G.Ramachandran Vs The Secretary to Government — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:9-4-2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.10068 of 2015 and

¶6

M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶7

G.Ramachandran .. Petitioner
vs.
1.The Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Secretariat, Fort St.George,
Chennai-600 009.
2.The Secretary,
Teacher Recruitment Board,
E.V.K.Sampath Building,
4th and 11th Floor,
DPI Campus,
College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600 006
3.The Director,
State Council Education Research
& Training,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai-600 006 .. Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to consider the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2015 and cancel the name of C.Alamedu Exam Roll No.IISD08290093 from the fresh round of Certificate verification of the Tentative Provisional List of candidates on 10.04.2015 after proper verification of the 5 years' experience certificate submitted by the above said C.Alamedu and consequently to declare the petitioner as the next eligible candidate for the fresh round of certificate verification and appoint him to the post of Senior Lecturer in District Institute of Education and Training (DIET).

¶9

For petitioner : Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy For respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran,G.A.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Heard Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Gunasekaran, the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and with the consent of parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

2.The petitioner applied for the post of Senior Lecturer (History) in District Institute of Education and Training. Now, it is stated that the certificate verification is going on, after publishing of the provisional list. In the provisional list of candidates, the name of the petitioner is not found. According to the petitioner, one Alamelu is included in the provisional list.

¶14

It is the case of the petitioner that on the earlier occasions, when the certificate verification took place, the said Alamedu produced bogus certificates. Now for the second time, the certificate verification is going on for all the candidates. The date of certificate verification is 10.4.2015.

¶15

It is stated by the learned Government Advocate that the second certificate verification is pursuant to the direction given by this Court.

¶16

According to the petitioner the documents produced by the said Alamedu are bogus and forged one. Only tomorrow (10.04.2015) the authorities are looking into those documents. If the said Alamelu is not selected, according to the petitioner, he would get a chance of getting his name included in the list. But the said Alamedu is not a party before this Court. Furthermore, the certificate verification is yet to take place. After certificate verification, if Alamedu is selected, the same would be questioned by the petitioner on all grounds. At this stage, this Court cannot issue direction as sought for by the petitioner to cancel the name of Alamedu from the provisional list, so that her certificate verification could not take place on 10.04.2015.

¶17

In the result, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed.

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

msk

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶24

2.The Secretary,
Teacher Recruitment Board,
E.V.K.Sampath Building,
4th and 11th Floor,
DPI Campus,
College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600 006
3.The Director,
State Council Education Research
& Training,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai-600 006
+ 1 cc to Mr.Dalit-Tiger R.C. Ponnusamy, Advocate SR.19600
+ 1 cc Government Pleader Sr.19896
SCD(CO)
EU 11.05.2015
W.P No.10068/2015

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ramachandran v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

G.Ramachandran v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navarathinam, Vs The Home Secretary

T.Selvaraja, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

N.Murugesan Vs The Director of Handlooms and

K.Kandasamy Vs The Chief Executive

K.Madhaiyan Vs D.Sabitha IAS

M.Poongodi Vs D.Sabitha IAS