Dismissed

G. Esteph Dorai v. K.Basker, Secretary Cum

Madras HC6 Mar 2015WP/46278/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a Quo Warranto against the Secretary cum Administrative Officer of Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd. The court held that nothing substantially survived in the petition and consequently disposed of the matter without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of without costs and the connected writ petition was closed.

G. Esteph Dorai Vs K.Basker, Secretary Cum — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated: 06..03..2015

¶3

Coram:

¶4

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

and

¶6

The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

¶7

W.P.No.46278 of 2002

¶8

G.Esteph Dorai .. Petitioner versus 1.K.Basker Secretary cum Administrative Officer Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd., (TEXCO) (Government of Tamil Nadu Undertaking) Major Parameshwaran (PVC) Memorial Building Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai 15.

¶9

2.Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd.,(TEXCO) represented by the Managing Director Tamil Nadu Government Undertaking Public Department, Secretariat Chennai 600 009.

¶10

3.The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government Pulic Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. .. Respondents

¶11

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Quo Warranto, directing Mr.K.Basker, the first respondent herein as the Secretary cum Administrative Officer in the Second Respondent Corporation and requiring him to show causes by what authority he claims to have, use, enjoy and perform the rights, duties and privileges of the said office as the same is illegal, violative and unconstitutional and to oust him from the public office which he holds illegally and unlawfully with immediate effect.

¶12

For Petitioner ::: Mr.A.V.Arun

¶13

For Respondents ::: Mr.V.J.Arul Raj for R.1 and R.2 Mr.S.T.S.Moorthy Government Pleader for R.3.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that nothing substantially survives in this writ petition.

¶18

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, WPMP.No.67358 of 2002 is closed.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksr Copy to: 1.The Secretary cum Administrative Officer Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd., (TEXCO) (Government of Tamil Nadu Undertaking) Major Parameshwaran (PVC) Memorial Building Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Chennai 15.

¶20

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd.,(TEXCO) Tamil Nadu Government Undertaking Public Department, Secretariat Chennai 600 009.

¶21

The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu Pulic Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

¶22

1 cc to Mr.V.J.Arul Raj ,Advocate, SR.No.12477 W.P.No.46278 of 2002 km(co)pmk.21.3.2015

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G. Esteph Dorai v. K.Basker, Secretary Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Esteph Dorai v. K.Basker, Secretary Cum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Indus Towers Ltd., Vs the Assistant Engineer

P.Rajendran Vs the District Collector

The Seafarers Port Welfare Vs the Secretary

Mr.L.Jhingan, Director, M/S. Vs the Department of Fisheries &

N.Raja Bernatsha Vs P.Jalendran

The District Collector, Vs a.Sahul Hameed