V.Veni v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider a representation for patta issuance for specific land and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks after affording opportunity.
What did the court decide?
Direction to 1st respondent to consider representation dated 18.11.2015 and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2015
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.No. 39851 of 2015
Veni
... Petitioner
vs.
1 The Tahsildar Office of Chengalpattu Taluk Chengalpattu Kancheepuram District 2 The Executive Officer Sri Padaladhri Narishimha Perumal Temple Singaperumal Koil Kancheepuram District
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st
respondent to consider and dispose off the representation of the
petitioner dated 18.11.2015.
For Petitioner .. Mr. M. Raja Sekhar
For R1 .. Mr. R.A.S.Senthilvel, AGP
For R2 .. Mr. K.V.Dhanapalan, AGP
ORDER
The petitioner seeks for issuance of patta through representation made on 18.11.2015 for the land situated in S.No.3A2, Bharathiar Street, Singaperumal Koil village, Chengalpattu circle, Kanchipuram District. On its non consideration, the present writ petition has been filed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the warrant officer should consider the representation for issuance of patta for land S.No.3A2 and pass orders on merits within eight weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Veni
- respondent
The Tahsildar Office of Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Sri Padaladhri Narishimha Perumal Temple, Singaperumal Koil, Kancheepuram District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court