Dismissed

M.Selvi v. The District Collector

Madras HC17 Dec 2015WP/39840/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the rejection of a patta application, the Court observed that an appeal filed by the petitioner regarding the same order was pending with the lower authority. Consequently, the Court held that concluding the writ petition was premature and directed the authority to dispose of the pending appeal after providing the petitioners an opportunity.

What did the court decide?

The Court directed the 3rd respondent to dispose of the pending appeal after giving petitioners an opportunity within eight weeks.

M.Selvi Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.12.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.39840 of 2015

¶6

M.Selvi
2. Miss.M.Nirmala
3. Mr.M.Manikandan
4. Master.M.Sathish
Minor rep. by mother and natural
guardian. ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The District Collector
Thiruvannamalai
Thiruvannamalai District
2. The District Revenue Officer
Thiruvannamalai
Thiruvannamalai District
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Thiruvannamalai
Thiruvannamalai District
4. The Tahsildar
Thandrampattu Village
ThandrampattuTaluk
Thiruvannamalai District ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for records relating to the order of the 4th respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.A3/11795/2012 dated 28.09.2015 to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to issue house site patta in the name of the petitioners in Survey No. 392/7 Tehnmudiyanur Village Thandarampattu Taluk Tiruvannamalai District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Muthukumaran

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

As the representation of the first petitioner seeking patta was not considered, a writ petition was filed before this Court in W.P.No.21985 of 2015. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 22.07.2015 in the above said writ petition, the order impugned has been passed on 28.09.2015 rejecting the request of the first petitioner for issuance of patta. Challenging the same, the first petitioner filed an appeal before the 3^rd respondent. Now, seeking to challenge the order passed by 4^th respondent dated 28.09.2015, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶12

Admittedly, the appeal filed by the first petitioner on 26.10.2015 is pending consideration with 3^rd respondent. Hence, the relief sought for in this petition cannot be granted. However, suffice it is to direct the 3^rd respondent to dispose of the appeal.

¶13

Hence, a direction is issued to 3^rd respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the first petitioner on 26.10.2015 after affording opportunity to the petitioners within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kua To

¶15

The District Collector Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District

¶16

The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The Tahsildar Thandrampattu Village ThandrampattuTaluk Thiruvannamalai District

¶19

+1cc to Mr.J.Muthukumaran, Advocate, S.R.No.68058

¶20

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.68286 (26.05.2016)

¶21

W.P.No.39840 of 2015

¶22

UG(CO) CA(08/01/2016)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Selvi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Selvi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Gandhi, Vs The Thasildar

R.Vijayakumar, President Vs the District Registrar

S.Nagarjan Vs M.Vijayakumar IAS

G.Padmapriya Vs the Chief Area Manager

Dr.R.R.Gnanasambandam, Vs the Principal Secretary

V.Veni Vs The Tahsildar