Disposed

Shebana, v. The Transport Commissioner

Madras HC11 Dec 2015WP/39062/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A batch of writ petitions was filed seeking a mandate to direct Regional Transport Officers to receive autorickshaw permit applications filed in Form CCPA with prescribed fees and consider them. The court disposed of the matter by ordering the authorities to accept, consider, and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing Regional Transport Officers to receive, consider, and pass orders on merits for grant of autorickshaw permits within four weeks.

Shebana, Vs The Transport Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 11.12.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.39062 to 39074 of 2015

¶6

Shebana ... Petitioner W.P.39062/15 K.Selvam ... Petitioner W.P.39063/15 M.Kannan ... Petitioner W.P.39064/15 R.Narayanan ... Petitioner W.P.39065/15 K.Dhanabakyamary ... Petitioner W.P.39066/15 R.Babu ... Petitioner W.P.39067/15 R.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner W.P.39068/15 R.Karunanidhi ... Petitioner W.P.39069/15 K.Mahendran ... Petitioner W.P.39070/15 S.ArunKumar ... Petitioner W.P.39071/15 A.Masthan ... Petitioner W.P.39072/15 R.Maran ... Petitioner W.P.39073/15 R.Ravichandran ... Petitioner W.P.39074/15 Vs The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai- 600 005 ...1st Respondent in all WPs

¶7

The Transport Commissioner State Transport Authority Chepauk Chennai- 600 005 The Regional Transport Officer Chennai (North East) Chennai.

¶8

...2nd Respondent in WPs.39062,39064, 39066,39067 & 39072 of 2015

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer Red Hills, Chennai.

¶10

...2nd Respondent in WPs.39063,39065, 39068,39069,39070 & 39071 of 2015

¶11

The Regional Transport Officer Chennai (North) Chennai.

¶12

...2nd Respondent in WPs.39073 & 39074 of 2015

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to receive the Application of the petitioner dated 28.9.2015 in Form CCPA with prescribed Fee for grant of Autorickshaw Permit and to consider the same.

¶15

Additional Government Pleader

¶16

These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking the common relief of issuing a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Regional Transport Authority concerned to receive the respective application of the petitioners in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of autorickshaw permit and to consider the same and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶17

Mr.M.S.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respective respondents.

¶18

Without going into the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respective concerned Regional Transport Officer to receive the respective applications of the petitioners, consider the same and pass appropriate orders for grant of autorickshaw permit, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

1.The Transport Commissioner
State Transport Authority
Chepauk Chennai- 600 005
2.The Regional Transport Officer
Chennai (North East) Chennai.
3.The Regional Transport Officer
Red Hills, Chennai.
4.The Regional Transport Officer
Chennai (North) Chennai.
+13cc's to Mr.S.Govindaraman, Advocate, S.R.No.67005
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.66895
W.P.Nos.39062 to 39074 of 2015
SV(CO)
CA(04/01/2016)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Shebana, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shebana, v. The Transport Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.R.Govindan, Vs The District Collector

Tvl.Real Image Media Vs The Assistant Commissioner

M/s. The Federal Bank Limited, Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

P.Periyasamy Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Sri Dhanalakshmi Traders Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

S.Anbu Vs The Commercial Tax Officer