Petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 praying for quashing of labour court orders and impleadment of contractors. The petition was dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.36619 of 2004 and
W.P.M.P.Nos.110 & 111 of 2015
1.A.Chandrasekaran 2.R.Ramesh 3.S.Mohanarangam 4.K.R.Sarathbabu 5.P.Jaikumar 6.K.Radhakrishnan 7.R.Venkatagiri 8.S.Umashanker 9.P.Kudiarasu 10.V.Dharani 11.A.Baskar 12.T.Wimfred Prabakaran 13.P.Rajasekar 14.R.Sivakumar 15.M.George 16.A.Victor 17.S.Ibrahim .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Management of The Garrison Engineers, Naval Air Station, INS Rajali, Arakkonam. 2.The Management of T.N.R. Enterprises, No.23, V.P. Kovil Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam. 3.The Management of R.D.Enterprises No.32, Arunachala Reddy Lind Street, Arakkonam. 4.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Labour Court - Cum - Industrial Tribunal, Shasthiri Bavan, Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ..
Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order dated 24.8.2004 passed by the fourth respondent in I.A.No.75, 78, 81 to 84, 87, 89, 92 to 94, 99 to 102, 104 and 141 of 2003 in I.D.No.308, 311, 314 to 317, 320, 322, 325 to 327, 332 to 335, 337 of 2001 and 98 of 2002 on the files of the Hob'ble Central Government Labour Court at Chennai and to quash the same and to direct the 4th respondent to implead the contractors 2nd and 3rd respondents as the parties in the I.D.No.308, 311, 314 to 317, 320, 322, 325 to 327, 332 to 335, 337 of 2001 and 98 of 2002.
For Petitioners..Mr.R.Dakshinamurthy
For RR 1 .. Mr.S.Makesh
Central Government Standing Counsel
For RR 3 ..Mr.R.Loganathan
For RR 4 ..Tribunal
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has made an endorsement that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
Sgl
To
1.The Management of
The Garrison Engineers, Naval Air Station, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ INS Rajali, Arakkonam.
T.N.R. Enterprises, No.23, V.P. Kovil Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam.
3.The Management of R.D.Enterprises No.32, Arunachala Reddy Lind Street, Arakkonam.
4.The Presiding Officer,
Central Government Labour Court - Cum -
Industrial Tribunal, Shasthiri Bavan, Chennai.
5.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
W.P.No.36619 of 2004
CO-MG
JD 15/12/2015
A.Chandrasekaran
The Management of The Garrison Engineers, Naval Air Station, INS Rajali, Arakkonam
The Management of T.N.R. Enterprises
The Management of R.D.Enterprises
The Presiding Officer, Central Government Labour Court - Cum - Industrial Tribunal, Shasthiri Bavan, Chennai
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
