D.Rajasekaran v. the Management of the Garrison
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.36396 of 2004
1.D.Rajasekaran 2.S.Simon Sundaraj 3.L.EdvinRajan 4.M.Murugan 5.A.Deviyaraj 6.K.Parthasarathy 7.V.Dhandapani 8.P.Joseph Rajkumar 9.A.Syed Karimullah 10.C.Muniendran 11.A.Rgamadullah 12.A.S.Andres Babu 13.D.Divaharan 14.J.Muthu 15.N.Chandrasekarakumar 16.P.T.Jadeshkumar .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Management of The Garrison Engineers, Naval Air Station, INS Rajali, Arakkonam. 2.The Management of Palani Enterprises, No.28 Murugappan Street Stuartpet Arakkonam. 3.The Management of Industrial Engineering Corporation Lakshmi Bhavan, Ground Floor, No.609 Anna Salai, Chennai - 6. 4.The Management of Blue Star, Anna Salai, Chenai. 5.The Presiding Officer, Central Government Labour Court - Cum - Industrial Tribunal, Shasthiri Bavan, Chennai. .. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the impugned order dated 24.8.2004 passed by the fourth respondent in I.A.No.105, 107 to 109, 111 to 119, 123, 124 and 129 of 2003 in I.D.No.349, 351 to 353, 355 to 363, 368, 369 and 374 of 2001 on the files of the Hon'ble Central Government Labour Court at Chennai and to quash the same and to direct the 5th respondent to implead the contractors as the parties in the I.D.No.349, 351 to 353, 355 to 363, 368, 369 and 374 of 2001.
For Petitioners.. Mr.R.Dakshinamurthy
For RR 1 .. Mr.S.Makesh
Central Government Standing Counsel
For RR2 .. M/s.G.R.Swaminathan
For RR 3 .. Mr.K.Chandrasekaran
For RR 4 .. Mr.G.Anand
For RR 5 .. Tribunal
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has
made an endorsement that the writ petition may be dismissed as
not pressed.
2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as
not pressed. No costs.
Sd/
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(CS-IV)
/TRUE COPY/
SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Sgl
To
1.The Management of
The Garrison Engineers,
Naval Air Station,
INS Rajali, Arakkonam.
2.The Management of
Palani Enterprises,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ No.28 Murugappan Street
Stuartpet Arakkonam.
3.The Management of
Industrial Engineering Corporation
Lakshmi Bhavan, Ground Floor,
No.609 Anna Salai, Chennai - 6.
4.The Management of
Blue Star, Anna Salai,
Chenai.
5.The Presiding Officer,
Central Government Labour Court - Cum -
Industrial Tribunal, Shasthiri Bavan, Chennai.
6.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
+1 CC to M/s. Usha Raman Advocate. SR.NO.65755
+1 CC to M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co Advocate. SR.NO.65875
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.Makesh, Advocate Sr 66198 (4/2/16)
W.P.No.36396 of 2004
CO-MG
JD 15/12/2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Rajasekaran and others
The Management of The Garrison Engineers, Naval Air Station, INS Rajali, Arakkonam
The Management of Palani Enterprises
The Management of Industrial Engineering Corporation
The Management of Blue Star
The Presiding Officer, Central Government Labour Court - Cum - Industrial Tribunal, Chennai
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court