Allowed

P.Thillainayagam, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC18 Jun 2015WP/29539/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired Headmaster sought Selection Grade/Special Grade pay and pension revision. Court held petitioner entitled to benefits by counting prior service effective from date of promotion, granting remedy within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Grant of Selection Grade/Special Grade pay with consequential monetary and pensionary benefits and arrears from date of promotion to be implemented within four weeks.

P.Thillainayagam, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.06.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

W.P.No.29539 of 2012

¶6

P.Thillainayagam .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Secretariat, St. George Fort,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Director of Elementary Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006.
3. The Chief Educational Officer,
O/o.Chief Educational Office,
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.
4. The District Elementary Educational Officer,
O/o.District Elementary Educational Office,
Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction Selection Grade and Special Grade to the petitioner in the cadre of Headmaster of Middle School as per G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009, and confer all the consequential benefits including revision in pension.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Anabayachozhan

¶9

For Respondents : Mr.D.Krishnakumar Special Government Pleader assisted by Mr.K.Karthikeyan

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Heard both sides.

¶13

2.1. Before 01.10.1970, the post of Secondary Grade Teacher, Primary School Headmaster and Middle School Headmaster carried the same scale of pay.

¶14

2.2. After 01.10.1970, the post of Middle School Headmaster became a promotional post. However, the juniors were retained, after 01.10.1970, in the post of Middle School Headmaster. This led to various litigations.

¶15

2.3. In these circumstances, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.784, Rural Development and Local Administration Department, dated 14.05.1979, reverting the juniors, who are holding the post of Middle School Headmaster as on 01.10.1970, as Secondary Grade Teacher or Primary School Headmaster, since both the post of Secondary Grade Teacher and Primary School Headmaster carried the same scale at that time, protecting the interest of junior teachers by protecting the scale of pay of Middle School Headmaster, which they received. That is, after about 9 years, the aforesaid development took place and the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.784.

¶16

2.4. The junior teachers, who faced reversion, challenged the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.784, dated 14.05.1989, and obtained order of stay and thereby continued as Middle School Headmaster, pursuant to the said order. Hence, the seniors got affected.

¶17

2.5. The matter went upto the Apex Court and the Apex Court was not willing to interfere with the government order in G.O.Ms.No.784 as it gave the benefit to both senior and junior teachers.

¶18

3.1. In these circumstances, the issue was resolved by the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in the order dated 25.04.1996 in O.A.Nos.2250 of 1991 directing to count the service rendered as Secondary Grade Teacher/Primary School Headmaster to give Selection Grade / Special Grade to the Middle School Headmaster, who joined as a Secondary Grade Teacher before 01.10.1970. The said order was followed by the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in the order dated 17.04.2002 in O.A.No.3521 of 1997 etc. batch.

¶19

3.2. There was revision in the scale of Middle School Headmaster, pursuant to V Pay Commission recommendation, which was implemented with effect from 01.06.1988.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

3.3 The petitioners involved in those Original Applications before Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal were promoted as Middle School Headmasters before 01.06.1988 and hence, they sought the revision of scale of pay applicable to the post of Middle School Headmaster as on 01.06.1988 by granting them the revision for Selection Grade / Special Grade in the post of Middle School Headmaster by counting the service rendered as Secondary Grade Teachers and Primary School Headmasters.

¶22

Later, some of the petitioners in the batch filed W.P.No.29626 of 2005 and 29624 of 2005 seeking for implementation of the order of the Tribunal, which attained finality and this Court by the order dated 15.09.2005 directed the respondents therein to implement the order. The said order was also confirmed by a Division Bench in W.A.No.223 on 21.04.2008.

¶23

Thereafter, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009, for counting the service rendered as Secondary Grade Teacher and Primary School Headmaster before 01.06.1988 for the purpose of grant of Selection Grade / Special Grade pay to Middle School Headmaster, in respect of the petitioners in those Original Applications, who became Middle School Headmaster before 01.06.1988.

¶24

Thus, if one joined as Secondary Grade Teacher before 01.10.1970, such person is entitled to Selection Grade / Special Grade Pay, on his promotion to the post of Middle School Headmaster, by counting the service rendered in the post of Secondary Grade Teacher / Primary School Headmaster. That is, it is made clear that such person shall be granted Selection Grade / Special Grade Pay in the post of Middle School Headmaster on his promotion to the post of Middle School Headmaster.

¶25

In this case, the petitioner was appointed as Elementary School Headmaster on 01.07.1964 and he was promoted as Middle School Headmaster on 10.09.1979. He retired from service on 31.05.2003.

¶26

The Teachers are entitled to Selection Grade / Special Grade pay in the post of Middle School Headmaster, from the date of promotion to the post of Middle School Headmaster, by counting the service of Secondary Grade Teachers / Primary School Headmasters, if they joined before 01.10.1970. The petitioner herein became Middle School Headmaster on 10.09.1979 and he is entitled to Selection Grade / Special Grade from the date of his promotion as Middle School Headmaster, by counting the service as Secondary Grade Teacher/Primary School Headmaster and accordingly he is also entitled to revision of pay in the

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Selection Grade / Special Grade in the post of Middle School Headmaster from 01.06.1988 based on G.O.Ms.No.210, dated 14.08.2009, as there was pay revision with effect from 01.06.1988.

¶29

In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the Government issued Government Orders granting the benefits of Selection Grade and Special Grade to the persons, who got orders from the Court, since it involves huge monetary benefits and the same cannot be sought for by the petitioner as a matter of right relying on those Government Orders.

¶30

In my view, the petitioner is entitled to seek Selection Grade / Special Grade in the post of Middle School Headmaster by counting the service of Secondary Grade Teacher / Primary School Headmaster from the date on which he was promoted as Middle School Headmaster.

¶31

In view of the aforesaid narration of facts, the petitioner is entitled to Selection Grade / Special Grade pay in the post of Middle School Headmaster with effect from the date of promotion as Middle School Headmaster.

¶32

For the aforesaid reasons, the petitioner shall be granted Selection Grade / Special Grade pay in the post of Middle School Headmaster, by counting the service rendered as Secondary Grade Teacher/Primary School Headmaster/Elementary School Headmaster, from the date of his promotion to the post of Middle School Headmaster, if the petitioner was not given the same already, with all monetary benefits and the pensionary benefits with arrears within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in the light of the aforesaid direction.

¶33

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶34

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶35

//True Copy//

¶36

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

¶39

The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o.Chief Educational Office, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. 4. The District Elementary Educational Officer, O/o.District Elementary Educational Office, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. W.P.No.29539 of 2012

¶40

gj(CO) srg(12/01/2016)

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Thillainayagam, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Thillainayagam, v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Pradeep Vs Mr.Veerappan

Mrs.Selvi, Vs The Enquiry Officer

S.R.Kumar Vs v.Kumar

C.Natesan Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

A.Mayavan Vs The District Collector

Thiru.M. Elankovan, Vs The State of Tamilnadu