S.R.Kumar v. v.Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court recorded the respondent representing the District Educational Officer's submission that the order dated 26.08.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013 was complied with and closed the contempt petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed on record of compliance.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
Cont.P.No.834 of 2015
in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.23465 of 2013
Hindu Higher Secondary School
Rep. by its Secretary, S.R.Kumar
Vaniyambadi - 635 751.
Vellore District. .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Mr.V.Kumar,
Chief Educational Officer,
Vellore, Vellore District.
2. Mrs.U.Priyadarshini,
District Educational Officer,
Tirupattur, Tirupattur,
Vellore District. .. Respondents
* *
Prayer : This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the
respondents herein for deliberately and wilfully, disobedying
the order dated 26.08.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.23465
of 2013.
* *
For Petitioner : Dr.C.Ravichandran
For Respondents : Ms.P.Rajalakshmi
Govt. Advocate
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed for the alleged nonhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ compliance of the order of this Court made in M.P.No.1 of 2013
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hindu Higher Secondary School
- respondent
Mr. V. Kumar
- respondent
Mrs. U. Priyadarshini
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court