Petitioner challenged the transfer order affecting his post of Agricultural Teacher. During hearing, counsel informed that the impugned order was revoked by the respondent. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.07.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.24969 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012
D.Thangamani, Agricultural Teacher, Mangaiyarkarasi Aided Middle School, Sundaresapuram, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.
...Petitioner
-Versus-
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the relief of issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.1951/A4/2012 dated 05.07.2012 and the consequential order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.276/A1/2012 dated 10.07.2012 and to quash the above said proceedings and for a consequential direction to the respondents to
restore the petitioner in the post of Agricultural Teacher, Mangayarkarasi Aided Middle School, Sundaresapuram, Udyarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District.
For petitioner : Mr.M.Rajendiran
For Respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran, GA for R1 to R3
ORDER
Challenging the order of transfer issued by the 2nd respondent on account of surplus strength and the consequential order of the 3rd respondent and for a consequential relief, the petitioner is now before this court with this writ petition.
W.P.No.24969 of 2012
CTK (CO) PSI (22.07.2015)
D. Thangamani
The Director of Elementary School Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Chennai
D. Hariparanthaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
