The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to examine the petitioner's application for a Scheduled Tribe Certificate, considering a cultural report sent by the Tribal Welfare Director, within two weeks.
Direction to examine the entire issue and pass orders on merits within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15/7/2015
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI
AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
W.P. No.21229 of 2015
C. Sivan ... Petitioner Vs
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to decide the application of the petitioner made on-line (Application ID 2015/0204/04/038999) dated 20th June, 2015 for the issuance of “Kurumans” Scheduled Tribe Certificate to him, on the basis of the cultural report on “Kurumans” sent by respondent No.1 within a reasonable time.
For petitioner : Mr. M. Radhakrishnan For respondents : Mr. R. Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.)
Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
8.The writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. Costs made easy.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
1 (1994) 6 SCC 241
mvs
To
+1cc to Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.36955
W.P. No.21229 of 2015
TEJ(CO)
CA(29/07/2015)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent Authority is directed to examine the petitioner's community status for issuance of Scheduled Tribe Certificate based on the submitted cultural report.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kumari Madhuri Patil Vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & OthersExplained¶16
Kumari Madhuri Patil Vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development & Others
(1994) 6 SCC 241Referred¶16
C. Sivan
The Revenue Divisional Officer Tirupattur
The Director of Tribal Welfare Chennai
Satish K. Agnihotri
M. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
