Writ petition seeking mandamus to direct appointment of the second respondent as Marriage Registrar was dismissed solely because the petitioner withdrew the petition.
Null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
W.P.No.20903 of 2013
Theodore Kirubakaran
.. Petitioner
..vs..
1.The Registrar of Marriages, Royapuram Sub-Registrar Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai.
2.Mara Gnanasekharan
3.Adasha Rebecca .. Respondents (R3 impleaded as per order dated 03.09.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.20903 of 2013)
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct enquiry and pass suitable order on the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2013to the 1st respondent regarding appointment of second respondent as Marriage Registrar under G.O.Ms.No.939/98 in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gopidurai O R D E R
In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw this Writ Petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
asvm To
The Registrar of Marriages, Royapuram Sub-Registrar Office, Rajaji Salai, Chennai.
W.P.No.20903 of 2013
SR(CO)
Eu 16.6.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Theodore Kirubakaran
Registrar of Marriages, Royapuram Sub-Registrar Office
Mara Gnanasekharan
Adasha Rebecca
R.S.Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
