J.K.Sudha v. K.Rajagopal
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was settled at Trial Court, rendering the petition infructuous, leading to its dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.06.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan
J.K.Sudha
...Petitioner/Accused
vs.
K.Rajagopal ...Respondent/Complainant.
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for records relating to the criminal proceedings in S.T.C.No.6120 of 2009, on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai, and to quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.R.Arunkumar for M/s.N.Manokaran and D.Gopal
For Respondent : No appearance
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made an endorsement, stating that the matter was settled before the Trial Court and hence, this Petition has turned infructuous, and the same is also recorded.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
[Name Redacted]
- respondent
K.Rajagopal
Coram
R.S.Ramanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court