The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel endorsing the withdrawal.
None. Writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.06.2015
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.18753 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013
K.Kausalya
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration,
Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
.. Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the proceedings of the respondent in Roc. No.052856/2010/S2 dated 30.06.2011 and quash the same.
For Petitioner .. Mr.V.Vijay Shankar For Respondent .. Ms.M.E.Raniselvam, Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2
D.HARIPARANTHAMAN, J.
mmi
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.06.2015
Index:Yes/No mmi
To
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration,
Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
W.P.No.18753 of 2013
K.Kausalya
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5
D.Hariparanthaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
