R.Parthiban v. The Commissioner of Municipal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition filed for issuance of mandamus. The court directed the respondent to complete pending disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner within six months.
What did the court decide?
The respondent is directed to complete the disciplinary proceedings and pass final orders within six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 09.06.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.16152 OF 2015
R.Parthiban [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. [ RESPONDENT ]
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to complete the disciplinary proceedings initiated in Roc.No.41151/2012/K2 dated 30.11.2012,within a reasonable period.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ranganathan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the respondent to complete pending disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within a reasonable period.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Parthiban
- respondent
Commissioner of Municipal Administration Chepauk, Chennai
Coram
D. Hariparanthaman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court