Disposed

S.Ramanujam, v. The Principal Secretary /

Madras HC8 Oct 2015WP/15696/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought writ of mandamus for issuing patta. Court noted the initial representation was individual and old but permitted filing a detailed representation within four weeks to direct the Tahsildar to act within eight weeks. Writ petition disposed with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to submit detailed representation; third respondent directed to pass orders within eight weeks after hearing; petition disposed.

S.Ramanujam, Vs The Principal Secretary / — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.10.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.15696 of 2015

¶6

S.Ramanujam,
Secretary of Ulagaram Valum Makkal
Podunala Sangam. ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Principal Secretary / Commissioner,
Land Administration Department,
Govt. of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai – 5.
2. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram.
3. The Tahsildar,
Sholinganallur,
Kancheepuram Taluk.
4. The Tahsildar,
Villlage Natham Office,
Tambaram. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 for the issue of patta to the members of the Sangam on the petitioner's representation dated 27.09.2010 and dispose of the same.

¶8

The petitioner's association made a representation to the third respondent on 27.09.2010 seeking issuance of patta. In the said representation, the petitioner has enclosed the relevant documents. As the said representation has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to issue patta.

¶9

A perusal of the representation said to have been made by

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

the petitioner on 27.09.2010 shows that it has been made only by the petitioner in his own capacity and not on behalf of association. It was also made more than five years back.

¶12

Be that as it may, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation on behalf of the members of Sangam enclosing the relevant documents, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the third respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks thereafter, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, namely, S.Ramanujam, representing Ulagaram Valum Makkal Podunala Sangam, and any other third parties if so required. With this direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs.

¶13

-Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rkm
To
1. The Principal Secretary / Commissioner,
Land Administration Department,
Govt. of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai – 5.
2. The District Collector,
Kancheepuram.
3. The Tahsildar,
Sholinganallur,
Kancheepuram Taluk.
4. The Tahsildar,
Villlage Natham Office,
Tambaram.
+1cc to Mr.I.V.S.Manian,Advocate(sr.55008)
+1 cc to GovernmentPleader(sr.55087)
W.P.No.15696 of 2015
Bvr(co)
cp 16/10/2015

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Ramanujam, v. The Principal Secretary /

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ramanujam, v. The Principal Secretary /

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Pachimuthu, Vs the Director of Elementary of

The Commissioner Vs M. Venkadasubbu

N.Devarajan Vs the District Registrar

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

L.M.Shah, Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)

A.L.Shah Vs the Deputy Collector (Revenue)