Dismissed

The General Manager (Hr) v. M.manikandan

Madras HC1 Jul 2015WA/892/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two writ appeals challenging orders in a bank staff selection matter. The appellant reserved liberty on a stay application. The orders below were closed without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed; the writ appeals were disposed of with liberty reserved for the appellant to apply for modification of the stay order.

The General Manager (Hr) Vs M.manikandan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 1/7/2015

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL

¶5

W.A. Nos.892 and 893 of 2015

¶6

The General Manager (HR)
Union Bank of India
Central Office
Union Bank Bhavan
239 Vidhan Bhavan Marg
Mumbai 400 021. ... Appellant in both the appeals
Vs
1. M. Manikandan
2. The Institute of Banking
Personnel Selection
rep. By its Director
IBPS House, D P Road
Near Thakur Polytechnic
Off Western Express Highway
Post Box No.8587
Kandivali
Mumbai 400 101.
3.The Registrar
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
Coimbatore 641 003. ...Respondents in both the
appeals

¶7

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order in M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 in W.P.No.16643 of 2015 dated 12/6/2015.

¶8

Petitions praying that in these circumstances stated therein and in the respective affidavits filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

¶9

(i) to grant an ad-interim stay of operation of the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceesings in DP:REC: 3755:15 dated 26.5.2015 (in MP.1/15) pending disposal of thet above writ petition.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

(ii)To grant an ad-interim direction directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the mandatory induction training at Union Bank of India, Staff College, Bannerghatta Road, Kalkere Post, Bengalaru, Karnataka, (in MP.2/15) pending disposal of the above writ petition 16643/15

¶12

Petition preferred under Art.226 of the constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of writ calling for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in DP.REC:3755:15 dated 26.05.2015 and quash t he same as;

¶13

According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the impugned interim order was passed on the basis of the facts narrated by the writ petitioner. In fact, the writ petitioner is not continuing on his job as appointment order has already been withdrawn. The impugned order was passed at notice of motion stage. In view of foregoing, it is proper to reserve liberty to to the appellant to make an appropriate application for modification of the order before the learned Single Judge. If such an application is made, the same may be considered at the earliest.

¶14

These writ appeals stand disposed of accordingly. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2015 are closed. No costs.

¶15

mvs.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Agricaltural University, Coimbatore.

¶18

The General Manager (HR) Union Bank of India, Central Officer, Bhavan Marg, Mumbai 400 021-400021

¶19

- 1 cc to M/s. T.s. Gopalan, Advocate Sr.32370

¶20

W.A.Nos.892 and 893 of 2015

¶21

TEJ(CO) EU 13.07.15

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The General Manager (Hr) v. M.manikandan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The General Manager (Hr) v. M.manikandan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary to Government Vs M.Rani

M/S Swelect Energy Systems Vs the Assistant Commissioner Ct

The Director General of Vs B.Rajendran

Tamilnadu Electricity Board Vs Mrs.Jayanthi Sundhar

The Commissioner Vs P.Sundarasu

M/s. Olympia Group, Vs Mr. M.Bright Kennedy