Partly allowed

The Commissioner v. P.Sundarasu

Madras HC1 Jul 2015WA/739/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court bench allowed an intra-Court appeal filed by the Commissioner of Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation against an order directing regularisation of petitioners' services. The Court followed earlier judgments, partly allowing the appeal to grant time scale based on performance assessment upon completion of three years.

What did the court decide?

Intra-Court appeal partly allowed on the same terms as W.A. Nos.12891; connected miscellaneous petition closed; costs awarded.

The Commissioner Vs P.Sundarasu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 1/7/2015

¶3

C O R A M

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL

¶5

W.A. No.739 of 2015 and M.P. No.1 of 2015 The Commissioner Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Coimbatore. ... Appellant/3^rd Respondent vs 1. P. Sundarasu 2. C. Arumugam 3. S. Kuppusamy 4. K. Rangasamy 5. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Fort St. George Chennai. 6. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration Chepauk Chennai. 7. The Assistant Commissioner Coimbatore Zone (South) Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Coimbatore. ... Respondents/Petitioner 1to4 / Respondents 5 to 7

¶6

Prayer:-Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 25/6/2013 made in W.P.No.12045 of 2013.

¶7

Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

regularize the services of the petitioners by bringing them on time scale of pay with effect from the respective dates of completion of 3 years of service as provided under G.O.Ms.NO.199 (MAWS Department) dated 12.8.1997 and in the light of the judgements passed by this Honourable court in W.P.25620/2006 dated 17.9.2008 and WA 47/2010 dated 23.6.2010 with all consequential and attendant benefit benefits and consequently dismiss the writ petition No.12045 of 2013 and allow the present appeal.

¶10

This intra-Court appeal is filed by the Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, impugning the order dated 25.06.2013 passed in W.P. No.12045 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge directed the respondents therein to regularise the service of the writ petitioners on completion of three years from the date when they were appointed on consolidated pay into regular time scale of pay and to pay consequential monetary benefits.

¶11

2 The aforesaid issue involved in the instant appeal came up for consideration before this Bench in W.A. Nos.12891 (The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department and two others vs. M. Rani (W.A. No.1289/2014 etc. batch), which was partly allowed by us observing as under:

¶12

“29 Resultantly, for the reasoning and analysis made hereinabove, the appeals are partly allowed to the extent that the respondents are entitled to consideration for grant of time scale on regular basis on the basis of performance assessment to be done on completion of three years and in the event, the performance of the respondents, is found satisfactory, they are entitled to regularisation on completion of three years, with all consequential monetary benefits. Costs made easy. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.”

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3 In view of the foregoing, the instant appeal also stands partly allowed on the same terms. Costs made easy. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶16

True Copy

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municpal Corporation, Coimbatore.
2. The Secretary to Government
of Tamil Nadu
Municipal Administration and
Water Supply Department
Fort St. George
Chennai.

¶18

The Commissioner of
Municipal Administration
Chepauk
Chennai.

¶19

The Assistant Commissioner Coimbatore Zone (South) Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Coimbatore.

¶20

+1 cc to M/s.V.Vijay Shankar, Advocate,SR.32507.
Ug(co)
krd 13/7
W.A. No.739 of 2015

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Commissioner v. P.Sundarasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner v. P.Sundarasu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary to Government Vs M.Rani

M/S Swelect Energy Systems Vs the Assistant Commissioner Ct

The Director General of Vs B.Rajendran

Tamilnadu Electricity Board Vs Mrs.Jayanthi Sundhar

The General Manager (Hr) Vs M.manikandan

M/s. Olympia Group, Vs Mr. M.Bright Kennedy