Dismissed

G.Radha v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jun 2015HCP/3812/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Habeas Corpus petition filed by a wife seeking her husband's release from illegal custody, the Court ordered production. Upon verification, the Court recorded that the detenu claimed non-existence of illegal detention and dismissed the petition. The Court observed the remedy is open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Petition for release and production of husband dismissed.

G.Radha Vs the Inspector of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 12.06.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶7

H.C.P. No.3812 of 2014

¶8

G.Radha ... Petitioner

¶9

-v-

¶10

1.The Inspector of Police, W-4, All Women Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

¶11

2.N.Raja ... Respondents

¶12

Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the first respondent to produce the petitioner's husband R.Rahul, aged about 30 years, who is under the illegal custody of the second respondent, before this Court and to set him at liberty.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sakthivel For Respondents: Mr.A.N.Thambi Durai Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.Sai Bharath Ilan - R2

¶14

(Order of the Court made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.)

¶15

This petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife of the detenu R.Rahul, aged about 30 years, to cause production of her husband before this Court and to set him at liberty.

¶16

2.The alleged detenu is secured and produced before this Court by the respondent police. On enquiry, the detenu told us that there is no illegal detention by anybody.

¶17

3.Having gone through the averments made in the accompanying affidavit and also the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the supporting documents, we are of the view to dismiss this petition, since there is no illegal detention.

¶18

4.It is open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum seeking her remedy, according to law.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

5.With the above observation, this petition is dismissed.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
W-4, All Women Police Station,
Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai 600 104.
+1 cc toMr.Sai Bharath Ilan, Advocate,SR.28822.
jp(co)
krd 25/6
H.C.P. No.3812 of 2014

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Radha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Radha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Sathya Vs the Secretary to Government

G.Selvakumar, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Rajeswari Vs the Inspector of Police

Daisy Rani Vs the Home Secretary

Mrs.Jothi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Lakshmi Vs State Rep by