A Habeas Corpus petition seeking the release of the petitioner's wife held in illegal custody was disposed of after the parties reached an amicable settlement during mediation.
The petition was disposed of after the parties reached a settlement via mediation, with the terms forming part of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 4.2.2015
CORAM:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and
The Hon'ble Mrs.Justice ARUNA JAGADEESAN
H.C.P. No.3115 of 2014
P.Gugan ... Petitioner
vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police,
Salem.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Kannangkurichi Police Station, Salem Dist.
3.Thiyagarajan
4. T.Kumathavalli ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the relief as stated therein.
For petitioner : Ms.Sumithra Vasudevan
For respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, APP
1 & 2
Ms.A.Madhumathi for R3 & R4
O R D E R
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to secure the petitioner's wife, viz., T.Divya, aged 23 years, who is in the illegal custody of respondents 3 and 4, and produced her before this Court and set her at liberty.
enclosing a copy of the Mediation Report, dated 3.2.2015, stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties concerned, as per the terms cited in the Mediation Agreement, dated 3.2.2015.
Sd/-
Asst. Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar.
gs
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Habeas Corpus petition should be dismissed after an amicable settlement is reached via mediation.
P. Gugan
T. Divya
The Commissioner of Police, Salem
The Inspector of Police, Kannangkurichi Police Station, Salem Dist.
M. JAICHANDREN
ARUNA JAGADEESAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
