The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or take steps in response to the appeal against the lower court's order and decree in a civil suit.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
C.R.P.(PD) NO.270 OF 2004
AND
C.M.P.NO.3001 OF 2004
A.Vallabadoss ...Petitioner/1st Defendant
Vs.
1.Devi (Insane)
2.Shanthi
3.S.Babu
4.Gangambal ...Respondents/Plaintiff
& 2nd defendant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order of the IV
Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, in I.A.No.822 of 2003 in
O.S.No.12385 of 1996 dated 13.11.2003.
For Petitioner : No appearance
O R D E R
The petitioner has not taken steps for the respondents 1, 3 and 4. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
TK
To
The IV Assistant Judge City Civil Court Chennai.
C.R.P.(PD) NO.270 OF 2004
MSM (CO) PSI (12.03.2015)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition be allowed despite non-appearance of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Vallabadoss
Devi
Shanthi
S. Babu
Gangambal
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
