In the absence of any representation either by the petitioner in person or through fresh counsel on record, this High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition for non-representation.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:21.04.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI C.R.P.NPD.No.1058 of 2006
C.Vembuli Naicker ...Petitioner/Plaintiff
.. Vs ..
M.Ponnuswami Naicker ...Respondent/Defendant
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of CPC,
against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge,
Kancheepuram, dated 30.09.2005 made in A.S.No.51/2004 confirming
the order of the learned District Munsif, Uthiramerur, dated
14.01.2003 made in O.S.No.173/1999.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
ORDER
No representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person
or through fresh counsel on record. Hence, this Civil Revision
Petition is dismissed for non-representation.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jrl
To
Copy to
The Section Officer,
V.R.Section, High Court,
Madras.
C.R.P.NPD.No.1058 of 2006
SV (CO)
PSI (08.05.2015)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition should be disposed of in the absence of appearance or representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Vembuli Naicker
M.Ponnuswami Naicker
K.B.K. Vasuki
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
