D. Rajaram v. K.P. Kandasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition filed by a tenant challenging a decreeetal order of the Rent Controller was dismissed for the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation on the hearing date.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.04.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI
C.R.P.No.2922 of 2010
D.Rajaram .. Petitioner/Tenant
Vs.
K.P.Kandasamy ... Respondent/Landlord
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Building (lease and rent control Act) 1960 as amended Act 23/73 and 1/80 against the fair and decreetal order dated 11.03.2010 made in RCA.No.2 of 2008 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge, Krishnagiri confirming the order dated 11.04.2008 made in RCOP.No.2 of 2005 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-District Munsif, Krishnagiri.
For Petitioner : No appearance. For respondent : Mr.V.Nicholas. O R D E R
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record for the previous hearings on 16.04.2015, 17.04.2015 and 20.04.2015 and for today's hearing. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed for non-representation. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Rajaram
- respondent
K.P.Kandasamy
Coram
K.B.K.Vasuki
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court