Dismissed

Oswal Marketing Agencies v. Babulal Jain

Madras HC4 Feb 2015CRP/170/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed two civil revision petitions filed by tenants challenging eviction decrees. Upon receiving an undertaking from the petitioners to vacate the premises by 30.06.2015, the court dismissed the petitions and directed the tenants to hand over possession and pay arrears of rent.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petitions were dismissed in view of the petitioner's undertaking to vacate the premises by 30.06.2015. Directing the tenants to vacate, hand over possession, and pay arrears and fut

Oswal Marketing Agencies Vs Babulal Jain — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 04.02.2015

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶6

CRP (NPD) Nos.170 & 222 of 2015 and

¶7

M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2015

¶8

M/s. Oswal Marketing Agencies Rep.by Proprietor Aruna M.Jain No.5, Muniappan Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 79.

¶9

... Petitioner in CRP170 of 2015

¶10

M/s. Oswal Binders, rep.by partners Kantilal Jain and Jaswanth Kumar Jain No.5, Muniappan Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 79. ... Petitioner in CRP 222 of 2015 vs. 1. Babulal Jain 2. Rakesh Kumar Jain ... Respondents in both CRPs

¶11

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act 18/1960 as amended by Act 23/1973 and Act 1 of 1980 against the Judgement and Decree dated 14.10.2014 passed in RCA Nos.1037 & 1038 of 2006 respectively passed by the Learned VII Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority) Court of Small Causes Chennai, by reversing the order of dismissal dated 05.09.2006 passed by the Learned XII Judge Court of Small Causes Chennai in RCOP Nos.1892 & 1893 of 2004 respectively.

¶12

For Petitioners in both CRPs : Mr.K.P.Ashok For Respondents in both CRPs : Mr.R.Madanagopal

¶13

¶14

C O M M O N ORDER

¶15

The Tenants in R.C.O.P.Nos.1892 & 1893 of 2004 on the file of the XII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai are the Revision petitioners. The respondents filed the petition for eviction on the ground of owners occupation.

¶16

When the civil revision petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners filed an affidavit of undertaking stating that the petitioners will vacate and handover vacant possession of the suit premises on or before 30.06.2015.

¶17

In view of the affidavit of undertaking, these civil revision petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶18

The tenants shall vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the suit premises to the landlords on or before 30.06.2015. The tenant shall pay the arrears of rent, if any, and also shall pay the future rent regularly.

04.02.2015

sms

The Learned VII Judge,

¶24

(Rent Control Appellate Authority), Court of Small Causes Chennai.

¶25

The Learned XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

¶26

¶27

K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J.

¶28

sms

¶29

CRP (NPD) Nos.170 & 222 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2015

¶30

04.02.2015

Oswal Marketing Agencies v. Babulal Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Oswal Marketing Agencies v. Babulal Jain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmanan Vs Ct Selvam @ Tamilselvam

P.Senthilnathan Vs Periyasamy,Periyammal(Died)

Pullaiyannan Vs Kunjanna Gounder @

Prabagaran @ Johnson Ebenezer Vs Pamelasheena Prabagaran

Thangavel Vs Sivasamy

M/S Raja Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ramasamy Gounder (decesed)