Thangavel v. Sivasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution were dismissed as voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioners. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.02.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
C.R.P.(PD) NOS.3719 AND 3720 OF 2009 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2009
1.Thangavel 2.Prakash
... Petitioners in both CRPs'
Vs.
1.Sivasamy
2.The Branch Manager Tamilnadu Industrial Investment Corporation Erode Branch, Perundurai Road, Erode & District.
3.K.Chinnasamy
... Respondents in both CRPs'
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thangavel
- petitioner
Prakash
- respondent
Sivasamy
- respondent
The Branch Manager Tamilnadu Industrial Investment Corporation Erode Branch, Perundurai Road, Erode & District
- respondent
K.Chinnasamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court