The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by an accused challenging the lower court's refusal to admit evidence of contemporary handwriting samples, finding the petitioner failed to produce satisfactory documents despite directed opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.11.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
Crl.R.C.No.1113 of 2015
A.V.Anantha Babu
... Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
Samundeshwari ... Respondent/Complainant
Criminal Revision filed under section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order passed in C.C.No.2 of 2012 dated 04.09.2015 by learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakonam
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Krishnan
For Respondent : Mr.R.Vijayakumar
O R D E R
This revision arises against the order of learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakonam, passed in C.C.No.2 of 2012 on 04.09.2015.
petitioner again has produced four documents viz three letters addressed to the Assistant General Manager, Indian Bank, and a Counter foil signed by Cashier, Indian Bank ARMB Branch, Chennai-8. The same were found not satisfactory by the court below and hence rejected. There against the petitioner has moved the present revision.
Crl.R.C.No.1113 of 2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow criminal revision challenging the order rejecting petitioner's proposed contemporary handwriting samples for comparison.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.V.Anantha Babu
Samundeshwari
C.T.Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
