A.Dhanabalan v. K.Shanmugam I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act due to the pendency of a related appeal filed against the underlying order.
The High Court closed a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act due to the pendency of a related appeal filed against the underlying order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
CONT.P.No.2910 of 2014
A.Dhanabalan
S/o.Alagarsamy …. Petitioner
vs
Mr.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,
Secretary to Government,
Finance Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent under the
Contempt of Courts for violating the order of this Court
made in W.P.No.5360 of 2005 dated 26.06.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.P.Kuilmozhi For Respondent : Mr.I.Arockiasamy Government Advocate *****
O R D E R
This petition is filed against the non-compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.5360 of 2005 dated
26.06.2012. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
In view of the said submission, this Contempt Petition
is closed.
Gm
SD/
DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2016.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
KMV/ASO/22/12/2015
One CC to Government Pleader, SR.14261
To
1.Mr.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.,
Secretary to Government,
Finance Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
A.Dhanabalan
Mr.K.Shanmugam
C.T.Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court