This judgment grants bail to petitioners accused of violent offences who were remanded to judicial custody. The court was inclined to grant bail given that the injured party had been discharged from the hospital.
Petitioners were ordered to be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Tenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.6020 of 2015
1 M.JAYASAKTHI 2 M.KANNAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2
Vs
STATE REP.BY
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE AVANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT.
CR. NO. 268/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SATHEESHKUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioners are A1 and A2 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.03.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(B), 341, 324, 379 and 506(ii) of IPC r/w section 4 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.268 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, the petitioners along with the other accused persons attacked the de-facto complainant with lethal weapons and caused injury.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioners.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ hospital, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
2
6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.
sd/10/04/2015 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.6020 of 2015 Date :10/04/2015 PA/10.04.2015/2P/7C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners charged with offences under sections 294(B), 341, 324, 379 and 506(ii) of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Jayasakthi
M. Kannan
State
K Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
