Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. alleging apprehension of arrest for offences under IPC Sections 498A, 294B, and 506 read with specific Acts. The order dismissed the petition recording the Respondent's submission that the inquiry was closed based on the de-facto complainant's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Tenth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.5160 of 2015
1 P.SELVAKUMAR 2 R.PALANISAMY 3 JANSIRANI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANKS NOT KNOWN
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVILLIPUTHUR,
VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.C.VAKEESWARAN, Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 498(A), 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
/ TRUE COPY /
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
msm 13.04.2015 p2/4c
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. considering the allegations.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
P. SELVAKUMAR
R. PALANISAMY
JANSIRANI
THE STATE
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
