On 26.03.2015, the Court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition. After recording that the police enquiry was closed due to a compromise among parties and some jewellery had been returned, the petition was closed with no further directions issued.
The petition was closed after recording that the police enquiry was closed due to compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.3662 of 2015
1 A. HAKKIM
2 M. ABDUL MAJID 3 A. RAHMAN BEEVI 4 A. JESIMA BEGUM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOTTAI, TRICHY TOWN & DT,
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.V.SELVA Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Since no regular case has been registered and only petition enquiry is pending, this Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners on 02.03.2015 with a direction to the first and second petitioners to appear before the respondent police at 6.00 p.m for a period of two weeks.
sd/-
26/03/2015
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOTTAI, TRICHY TOWN & DISTRICT.
2.THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
rg.31.03.2015 2p.3c.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition should be disposed of given the closure of the enquiry due to compromise.
Whether the interim anticipatory bail granted earlier remains operative or requires extension.
Whether the petitioners are required to surrender the returned jewellery.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. HAKKIM
M. ABDUL MAJID
A. RAHMAN BEEVI
A. JESIMA BEGUM
THE STATE
P.N.PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
