Senthilkumar v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.22439 of 2014
SENTHILKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, OTTANCHATHIRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CRIME NO.19/2014. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU, Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SENTHILKUMAR
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
P.N.PRAKASH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court