Nagarajan v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 CrPC after recording that police closed the complaint citing mistake of fact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.2414 of 2015
1 NAGARAJAN
2 ARASU 3 SYAMALA DEVI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3
Vs STATE REP BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAIKUDI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT,
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.V. KANNAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN
Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Govt.Advocate submitted that the respondent police has conducted the enquiry and closed the complaint as 'mistake of fact'.
Records the same, this petition is dismissed. sd/20/04/2015 / TRUE COPY /
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KARAIKUDI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT
2.THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.V. KANNAN Advocate SR.No.20289
PA/21.04.2015/1P/4C
NAGARAJAN
ARASU
SYAMALA DEVI
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARAIKUDI
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court