Leo Francis v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail as it had been filed by the petitioner's counsel and subsequently withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.20609 of 2014
LEO FRANCIS ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL, CRIME NO.2/2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. M. SUDHAKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
20/04/2015
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KODAIKANAL
2 THE ADDLPUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S. M. SUDHAKAR Advocate SR.No.20622
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.20609 of 2014 Date :20/04/2015
AA/22.04.2015/1p- 4c/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
LEO FRANCIS
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court