Anticipatory bail petition filed by three accused persons. The Government Advocate submitted that the police investigation had been conducted and closed. The Court accepted the submission and closed the petition without making any substantive order on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.15599 of 2014
1 CHINNAKALAI
2 PANDIAMMA 3 CHANDRA ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 3
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.MANOHARAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the state.
2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed.
TO 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT. 2.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.R.MANOHARAN Advocate SR.No.14986
ORDER
CRL OP(MD) No.15599 of 2014
rg.13.04.2015 1p.4c.
CHINNAKALAI
PANDIAMMA
CHANDRA
THE STATE
P.N.PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
