Petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel's representation and endorsement to the Court.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.17949 of 2015
1 P. RAJASEKARA PANDIAN 2 R. MUTHUMARI 3 R.PETCHIAMMAL @ SIVARANJINI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, MADURAI CITY. (CR. NO. 77/2015.) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) FOR INTERVENOR : N.SATHISH BABU ADVOCATE
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
After arguing on length, when this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
Date :26/10/2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. RAJASEKARA PANDIAN
R. MUTHUMARI
R.PETCHIAMMAL
THE STATE
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
