K. Anbalagan v. State Rep by Inspector of
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl. O.P. for anticipatory bail under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. was closed after the Government Advocate submitted that the enquiry into the complaint regarding petitioners had been conducted and closed. The court recorded this submission and disposed of the petition without granting bail.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Seventh day of October Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.15590 of 2015
1 K. ANBALAGAN
2 P. CHINNAKAMAN ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED
RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs
THE STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABBING CELL, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI.
(CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S S.PALANIVELAYUTHAM Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. ANBALAGAN
- petitioner
P. CHINNAKAMAN
- respondent
THE STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANTI LAND GRABBING CELL, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court