Allowed

David Packiya Babu v. State Rep by Inspector of

Madras HC8 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/14884/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim bail petition under CrPC Section 439, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court made the interim bail absolute after the accused executed a registered Will committing the subject matter to an irrevocable deed, as part of a settlement at the Mediation Centre.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted to petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 herein is hereby made absolute.

David Packiya Babu Vs State Rep by Inspector… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.14884 of 2015

¶6

1 DAVID PACKIYA BABU 2 PUSHPA RANJINI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.2 & 3

¶7

THE STATE REP BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF MARTHANDAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶9

(CRIME NO.413/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.AJMAL KHAN Senior counsel for

¶11

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

For Intervenor : Mr.M.P.Senthil,Advocate

¶13

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that the parties have appeared before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench and as per the compromise reached before the Mediation Centre, the accused Nos.2 and 3 have executed a registered Will, dated 06.10.2015 vide document No.108/2015 in Sub Registrar Office, Palliyadi.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners filed an affidavit of the petitioners/accused Nos.2 & 3, dated 07.10.2015 stating that they will not cancel the said Will and the same can be treated as an irrevocable deed and if any cancellation made, it shall be treated as null and void.

¶17

3.Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the intervenor and the affidavit filed by the petitioners dated 07.10.2015, the interim bail already granted by this Court is made absolute.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶20

¶21

1 THE INSPECTOR OF MARTHANDAM POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶22

2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KUZHITHURAI.

¶23

3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

¶24

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶25

+1. CC to M/S.M.P.SENTHIL,Advocate SR.No.59477. +1CC to M/S.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, SR.No. 59972.

¶26

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14884 of 2015 Date :08/10/2015

¶27

AM/09.10.2015/AMF/SAR-I/2P/7C

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

David Packiya Babu v. State Rep by Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

David Packiya Babu v. State Rep by Inspector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Anbalagan Vs State Rep by Inspector of

S.K. Sudhakar Vs State Rep by Inspector of

S.V. Kalimuthu Vs the Inspector of Police

Saai Vijayakumaravel Vs the Deputy Superintendent

N. Selvendran Vs the Inspector of Police

R. Pravinkumar Vs State Rep by Inspector of