Disposed

Aruldoss v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC25 Jun 2015CRL OP(MD)/11400/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police to complete the investigation in Crime No.48 of 2014 and file the final report within one month of receiving the order, disposing of the Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete investigation and file the final report in Crime No.48 of 2014 within one month.

Aruldoss Vs the Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.06.2015

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11400 of 2015

Aruldoss

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State represented by

¶11

The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli.

¶12

2.The Inspector of Police,

¶13

Aaikudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

(In Crime No.48 of 2014) ...Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of

¶16

the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent to investigate into the matter and to file final report in Crime No.48 of 2014 on the file of the second respondent within a stipulated time as prescribed by the Hon'ble Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh

¶18

For Respondents : Ms.S.Prabha

¶19

Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Seeking a direction to the second respondent to file final report as expeditiously as possible, this petition has been filed.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and perused the records.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court considers it appropriate to direct the second respondent to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.48 of 2014, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ a copy of this order.

¶24

¶25

The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶28

/True Copy/

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Aaikudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶33

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶34

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

Pjl

¶36

AA/15.07.2015/ 2p- 4c/

¶37

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.11400 of 2015 25.06.2015

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Aruldoss v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aruldoss v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Th.S.Jeyapaul Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthukrishnan Vs the Superintendent of Police

S.Kannan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Jameela Beevi Vs the Superintendent of Police

C.Subramanian Vs the Commissioner of Police

Balasubramanian Vs the Inspector of Police