Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking direction to register FIR. Court directed petitioner to appear for enquiry, police to register case if cognizable offence made out, pursuant to Lalita Kumari guidelines.
Direction to petitioner to appear for enquiry and to respondent police to register case if cognizable offence made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.02.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
Crl.O.P.No.790 of 2015
V.Venkatesan
...Petitioner
vs.
The State rep by
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 22.12.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.K.Sekar For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R
This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the second respondent to register an F.I.R. on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner on 22.12.2014.
keeping in view the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] and investigate the same in accordance with law.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
Dt:2/3/2015
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District,
District Police Office, Dharmapuri-5.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thoppur Police Station,
Thoppur Post, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to M/s.G.K.Sekar, Advocate SR 9864
rsk(co)
prk4/3
Crl.O.P.No.790 of 2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent police should register an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint under Section 482 CrPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & OthersExplained¶16
re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)]
2 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Venkatesan
The State rep by The Superintendent of Police
The Inspector of Police
R. S. Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
