Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.Padmavathi Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

Home
Madras HC
2015
V.Padmavathi Vs State Rep byV.Padmavathi v. State Rep by

Dismissed

V.Padmavathi v. State Rep by

Madras HC23 Feb 2015CRL OP/32595/2013

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.02.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN

Crl.O.P.No.32595 of 2013

V.Padmavathi

...Petitioner

vs.

State represented by

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District.

The Inspector of Police,

Kudimangalam Police Station,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
V.Padmavathi
respondent
State represented by The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District
respondent
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District
respondent
The Inspector of Police, Kudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 23 Feb 2015 · February
Registered: 16 Dec 2013
Case no.: CRL OP/32595/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.s.ramanathan

N.Selvakumar Vs the Commissioner of Police
20 Feb 2015
Indus Towers Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner
20 Feb 2015
V.Mani Vs the Superintendent of Police
20 Feb 2015
V.Venkatesan Vs the Superintendent of Police
23 Feb 2015

Cite this judgement

V.Padmavathi v. State Rep by, CRL OP/32595/2013 (MAD), decided on 23 February 2015.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.S.RAMANATHAN

Parties & counsel

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Tiruppur District. ...Respondents

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja

Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to provide adequate police protection to life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members.

There is no representation for the petitioner.

Having regard to the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the year 2013, this petition has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. jvm

-s/d-

Assistant Registrar(Ad-I)

Dt:4/3/2015 True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur District.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District.

The Inspector of Police, Kudimangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

vgi(co)
prk6/3
Crl.O.P.No.32595 of 2013

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.S.RAMANATHAN

CNR

HCMA011128742013

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Ezhumalai, Vs State Rep. by

23 Feb 2015

M.Meenadevi Vs the Superintendent of Police

23 Feb 2015