This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous because the respondent (complainant) had died and the underlying Criminal Case was closed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition was also closed.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected M.P. closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.06.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN
Crl.O.P.No.27357 of 2009
and
M.P.No.1 of 2009
A.K.Kathirvel ... Petitioner
vs.
K.V.R. Murugan ... Respondent
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for records in
Crl.M.P.No.7157 of 2009, in C.C.No.270 of 2004, on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Erode, dated 25.11.2009, and to set aside
the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan
O R D E R
It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner that this Petition was filed by the petitioner/accused,
challenging the order, dated 25.11.2009, passed by the learned
Judicial Magistrate No.II, Erode, in Crl.M.P.No.7157 of 2009, in
C.C.No.270 of 2004. The learned counsel also submitted that the
complainant, viz., the respondent herein died and C.C.No.270 of 2004,
was also closed. The learned counsel, therefore, submitted that the
Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sd
To
The Judicial Magistrate No.II,
Erode.
Crl.O.P.No.27357 of 2009
VSN(CO)
CA(05/06/2015)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.K. Kathirvel
K.V.R. Murugan
R.S.Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
