Disposed

Ananth v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Mar 2015CRL OP/6304/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed for anticipatory bail rejected due to Section 18 bar of the SC/ST Act, the Court directed the petitioner to surrender within ten days. The trial court was mandated to consider the bail application on the same day of surrender.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender before the concerned Court within ten days; bail application to be considered on the same day of surrender.

Ananth Vs the Inspector of Police — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.03.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.6304 of 2015
Ananth ... Petitioner
Vs.
State rep. by
Inspector of Police
PCR Cell,
Puducherry.
Crime No.14/2013 ... Respondent
Prayer :
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure praying to directing the learned II Additional
District and Sessions Judge (Special Court for SC/ST cases),
Pondicherry to accept the surrender of the petitioner herein
concerned in Crime No.14 of 2013 on the file of the Station House
Officer, PCR Cell, Puducherry and consider the bail petition on the
same day itself.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balu
For Respondent : Mr.J.Kumaran, G.P
ORDER
This petition is filed for direction to the learned II
Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Court for SC/ST
cases), Pondicherry to accept the surrender of the petitioner herein
concerned in Crime No.14 of 2013 on the file of the Station House
Officer, PCR Cell, Puducherry and consider the bail petition on the
same day itself.

¶6

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case for the alleged offences

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

under Sections 147, 148, 448, 323, 324, 427, 506(ii) and 149 IPC and 7(i)(d) of PCR Act, 1955 r/w Sec.3 (x) (xi) (xiv) of SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 in Crime No.14 of 2013 and that in view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act, he cannot move any anticipatory bail application and therefore, the petitioner has come forward with the above said prayer.

¶9

3.Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶10

4.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court direct the petitioner to surrender before the Court concerned within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file necessary application for bail. The Court concerned shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, on merits, on the same day of surrender of the petitioner.

¶11

5.This Criminal Original Petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To 1.The 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Special Court for SC/ST Cases) Pondicherry.

¶12

2.The Inspector of Police PCR Cell, Puducherry.(Crime No.14/2013) 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

¶13

1 cc to Mr.K.Balu ,Advocate, SR.No.13528 Crl.O.P.No.6304 of 2015 eu(co) pmk.23.3.2015

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ananth v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananth v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.M.Rangasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Guruswamy Vs the Inspector of Police

S.v.Sriramalu Vs the Inspector of Police

J.Seenivasan@ Seenu Vs State Rep by

P.Subramaniam Vs State Rep by

Bathugul Jaman, Vs State by Inspector of Police