Disposed

M.M.Rangasamy v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Mar 2015CRL OP/6038/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed to direct the Judicial Magistrate to complete a trial within three months. After reviewing the Magistrate's report explaining a delay caused by a mistakenly thought pending stay order, the Court directed the Magistrate to conclude the case within two months.

What did the court decide?

The Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore is directed to dispose of the case in C.C.No.18 of 2003 within two months.

M.M.Rangasamy Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 10.03.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.6038 of 2014

¶6

M.M.Rangasamy

¶7

...Petitioner/Complaint

¶8

vs.

¶9

The State, rep. by Inspector of Police, B-10, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore District ...Respondent/Respondent

¶10

[Crime No.301/02]

¶11

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore, to complete the trial in C.C.No.18 of 2003, within a stipulated time of three months

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Abrar Md Abdullah

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja

¶14

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking direction upon the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore, to complete the trial in C.C.No.18 of 2003, within a stipulated time.

¶17

This Court, by order, dated 29.01.2015, called for report from the aforesaid Magistrate regarding the progress of the case in C.C.No.18 of 2003, pending on his file. Pursuant to the said order, the learned Magistrate has sent a report, dated 09.02.2015, stating that the case in C.C.No.18 of 2003, was adjourned from 2007 onwards on the ground that Criminal Original Petition No.7502 of 2005, filed by the accused to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.18 of 2003 was pending and stay was granted. The learned Magistrate has also stated that on scrutiny of records, he found that the stay granted in Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2005, was dismissed on 16.07.2008. Unfortunately, without looking into the dismissal of Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2005, successive Judicial Magistrate No.V, adjourned the case mechanically, on the premise that Crl.O.P.No.7502 of 2005 is pending, wherein, the stay has been granted.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

In view of the abovesaid report, 09.02.2015, and the explanations contained therein, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, by directing the Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore, to dispose of the case in C.C.No.18 of 2003, pending on his file, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/ True copy /
Sub Assistant Register
sd
To
1. Judicial Magistrate No.V, Coimbatore,
2 do thro the Chief Judicial Magistrate
Coimbatore
3 Inspector of Police,
B-10, Selvapuram Police Station,
Coimbatore District.
4 The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.I.Abrar Md Abdullah, Advocate sr.no.13510
Crl.O.P.No.6038 of 2014
RR 26/03/2015
SR[CCO]

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.M.Rangasamy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.M.Rangasamy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Muthuraman Vs State Rep by

Sivasandhar Vs Easwaran

Niranjan @ Saravanakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

4.R.K. Yarn Trding Co.,Rep.by Vs 1.SANGEETHA Exports,Rep.by Its

Pattabiram Yarn Co., by Prop., Vs 1.SANGEETHA Exports,by Partner

S.Raja, S/O.Sunramani, Vs the Inspector of Police