The petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing a Court-Memo was heard. The petitioners' counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.OP No.30912 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.K.Pooventhan
2.S.Senthilvadivu
3.S.Aishwarya
4.R.Uma .. Petitioners/Respondents
Vs
P.Sivasankari .. Respondent/Petitioner.
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records relating to the C.M.P.No.3177 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Portonovo, quash the same by allowing this criminal original petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Radha Pandian
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
sms
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.OP No.30912 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Sivasankari
K.Pooventhan
S.Senthilvadivu
S.Aishwarya
R.Uma
P.N.PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
