Allowed

Rajkumar v. State Rep by

Madras HC12 Oct 2015CRL OP/25456/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Criminal Original Petition filed by accused persons arrayed in a vigilance case. The court directed the Principal District and Sessions Court/Special Court Cuddalore to dispose of any subsequent bail application filed by the petitioners on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Principal District and Sessions Court/Special Court Cuddalore to dispose of the bail application filed by the petitioners on merits.

Rajkumar Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 12.10.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM

¶5

Crl.O.P No.25456 of 2015

¶6

Rajkumar 2. K.Govindarajan 3. P.Sabapathy ... Petitioners

¶7

Vs. State rep.by Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Cuddalore ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the Principal District Sessions Judge/the Special Court Cuddalore to consider the bail application sympathetically and pass orders on merits on the same day on the petitioner's surrender in connection with Crime No. 11 of 2015 pending investigation on the file of the Inspector of police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Cuddalore, Cuddalore District and pass such other order or orders as this Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.

¶9

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to give necessary direction to the Principal District and Sessions Court/Special Court Cuddalore to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioners sympathetically and pass orders on merits on the same day.

¶12

It is averred in the petition that the petitioners have been arrayed as accused 1 to 3 in Crime No.11 of 2015 on

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

the file of the respondent police. Further, it is averred in the petition that the petitioners are said to have committed offences under S.C & S.T.Act. Under the said circumstances, present petition has been filed for getting the relief sought therein.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has advanced his arguments on the basis of the averments made in the petition.

¶16

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has contended that the relief sought for in the present petition cannot be practically granted and at the most, the concerned court can be directed to consider the bail application to be filed by the petitioners on merits.

¶17

Considering the rival submissions made on either side, this court is of the view to give the following direction: In fine, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. If any bail application is filed by the petitioners in Crime No.11 of 2015 Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Cuddalore, the Principal District and Sessions Court/Special Court Cuddalore is directed to dispose of the same on merits.

¶18

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ajr To 1. The Principal District and Sessions Court/Special Court Cuddalore.

¶19

The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Cuddalore +1cc to the Public Prosecutor, S.R.No.55867 +1cc to Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.55644

¶20

Crl.O.P No.25456 of 2015 SVI(CO) CA(20/10/2015)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aruldos Ashok @ Ashok Vs State by

Mr.R.Marimuthu Vs the State Rep. by

Pandian Alias Samuel Raj Vs the Inspector of Police

S.M.N.Dominic, Vs State Rep. by

Mohamed Mustafa Kamal Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Vijayakumar Vs State Rep. by