Dharmalingam v. Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner and respondent failed to appear for the hearing held on 04.02.2015.
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner and respondent failed to appear for the hearing held on 04.02.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.02.2015 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH
Crl.O.P.No.21736 of 2010
Dharmalingam ... Petitioner/Appellant/ (Owner of the Vehicle)
Vs
The State rep., by the Sub Inspector of Police P.E.W. Thirukoilur Villupuram District (Cr.No. 33/09) ... Respondent/Respondent (Complainant) Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in C.A.No. 39 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dated 09.03.2010 confirming of the order of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Villupuram in Na.Ka.No. 15/confis/Addl. Superintendent of Police, Villupuram/09 dated 18.04.2009 and set aside the same and release the vehicle TN 32 C 7074 to the petitioner herein.
*** For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent: No appearance O R D E R
Already the Petition came up for hearing on 28.01.2015, but there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and as such, it was adjourned and posted today under the caption for dismissal. When the case was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This clearly shows that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Respondent side also no representation. In the said circumstances, the Petition is dismissed for want of non prosecution.
Sd/ Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst.Registrar
vsg
To
1 The Principal Sessions Judge,
Villupuram.
2 The Additional Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram.
3 The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram.
4 The Sub Inspector ofPOlice,
P.E.W, Thiurkoilur, Villupuram.
5 The Public Prosecutor,
High Court,Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.21736 of 2010
RSY (CO)
VS 23.02.2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmalingam
The State
R. Karuppiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court