The petitioner failed to appear and file representations in a criminal original miscellaneous petition. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.02.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH
Crl.O.P.No.19982 of 2010 And M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2010
N.Dhanasekaran ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Accused Vs A.Rajendran ... Respondent/Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and set aside the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur, in Crl.M.P.No. 5793 of 2010, dated 16.08.2010 in S.T.C.No. 1584 of 2009.
For Petitioner : No appearance
O R D E R
Already the Petition came up for hearing on 22.01.2015, but there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and as such, it was adjourned and posted today under the caption for dismissal. When the case was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This clearly shows that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. In the said circumstances, the Petition is dismissed for want of non prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsg
To
Crl.O.P.No.19982 of 2010
And M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2010
RSY(CO)
Eu 20.02.15
N. Dhanasekaran
A. Rajendran
R. Karuppiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
