Disposed

C.Jeevarani v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Jul 2015CRL OP/16123/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras directed the respondent police to conduct a prompt enquiry into the petitioner's complaint. The court held that if a cognizable offence was made out during the enquiry, a regular case must be registered in accordance with Lalita Kumari.

What did the court decide?

The respondent is directed to conduct an expeditious enquiry; upon finding a cognizable offence, a regular case shall be registered.

C.Jeevarani Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 01.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL.OP.No.16123 of 2015

¶6

¶7

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kovilpatti,

¶8

Tuticorin District. .. Respondent

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to issue direction to the respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.04.2015 and to investigate the same and file final report before the appropriate Court in accordance with law within a time stipulated.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Dhanasekar

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.04.2015 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

¶13

Heard Mr.R.Dhanasekar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶14

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, a petition enquiry is pending before the respondents in C.S.R.No.133 of 2015.

¶15

Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent is directed to conduct enquiry expeditiously and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered, following the decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsm
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Kovilpatti,
Tuticorin District.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
1 cc to Mr.R.Dhanasekar , Advocate Sr.No.32569
CRL.OP.No.16123 of 2015
rsk(co)
pmk.21.7.2015

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Jeevarani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Jeevarani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Shri Meera Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs S.Hari Baskar

M/S.Shri Meera Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs S.Hari Baskar

Ms.Ligoriya Vs I.P.Yesudoss

S.Sabari Raja Vs the State by

V.Rajendran Vs the Protection Officer

Mrs.Gunappolu Vs a.Mahadevan