Allowed

M/S.Reliance Jioinfocomm v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jul 2015CRL OP/10338/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Madras High Court, in a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., directed the police respondents to provide adequate protection at the petitioner's expense for eight weeks for the erection of a BTS tower at Periapatti Village, Namakkal.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent police to enquire and give adequate police protection for erecting the tower at the petitioner's cost for eight weeks.

M/S.Reliance Jioinfocomm Vs the Inspector of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 07.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL.OP.No.10338 of 2015

¶6

M/s.Reliance JioInfocomm Limited, having its Circle Office at A1 Tower, 8^th Floor, 89-90, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4. Represented by its Legal Manager, D.Kalaimani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Town Police Station, Namakkal.

¶7

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, EB Colony, Paramathi Road, Namakkal District.

¶8

3.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Thiruchengode Road, Namakkal District. ... Respondents

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents herein to provide the effective police protection to the petitioner's company to erect transmission cell phone tower and to install all the telecommunication electrical & electronics equipments, OFC Cable and its maintenance workon the said BTS transmission Tower at S.F.No.212/1 and its TS No.2, Ward C, Block 13, situated at Periapatti Village, Namakkal – 637003.

¶10

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein to provide police protection to the petitioner's company to erect transmission cell phone tower and to install all the telecommunication electrical & electronics equipments, OFC Cable and its maintenance workon the said BTS transmission Tower at S.F.No.212/1 and its TS No.2, Ward C, Block 13, situated at Periapatti Village, Namakkal-637003.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.

¶13

In similar cases, namely Crl.OP.Nos.25757 of 2014 and 12596 to 12619 of 2014, this Court has granted similar reliefs to the same petitioner, in respect of other places.

¶14

Following the earlier orders, this Court directs the respondent police to enquire and give adequate police protection to the petitioner, for erecting transmission tower at S.F.No.212/1 and its TS No.2, Ward C, Block 13, situated at Periapatti Village, Namakkal-637003, at the cost of the petitioner for a period of eight weeks.

¶15

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. Sd/Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar gya To 1.The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Town Police Station, Namakkal. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, EB Colony, Paramathi Road, Namakkal District. 3.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Thiruchengode Road, Namakkal District. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1 CC Mr.K. Govindarajan,Advocate, SR No. 33849. CRL.OP.No.10338 of 2015 RJ(CO) KRA(23/07)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Reliance Jioinfocomm v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Reliance Jioinfocomm v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Parameswaran Vs State Rep. by

N.Rajagopal Vs State Rep. by

A.M.Giri Vs State Rep. by

Selvi. Mariammal Vs State Rep. by

M/S.Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Anbu Vs the Inspector of Police